VR 2.0: More mobile, more social, more convincing
Years after the Oculus Kickstarter campaign for the Oculus Rift, the consumer version (along with stiff competition) is available for purchase. The current hardware is some of the most polished for a first-generation offering, and the new medium is attracting talent. That said, the hardware is not without its compromises.
While it may be blowing the minds of the dedicated VR crowd, it will need to meet a higher bar before it enjoys the kind of sales volumes we see in the gaming console or smartphone spaces. The good news is, the VR industry is already moving quickly on more advanced VR. Here are five things we can look forward to in the upcoming second-generation VR:
1. Untethered usage
While it will be a nuisance to set up and deal with external cameras in the first wave of devices, it’s not something we’ll need to live with forever. The “outside in” external camera approach will eventually be replaced by a superior “inside out” method of head tracking. “Inside out” tracking places one or more cameras on the headset itself – similar to our own eyes – that can detect motion in the external environment. Not only will this do away with the required external cameras perched around your room, it will also untether devices so that VR headsets can be used just about anywhere.
2. Optimized mobile hardware
There may always be a case for a VR device tethered to a dedicated gaming PC for the very high-end graphics. But there also is a strong argument for untethered form factors that give up some graphical prowess in return for the portability and simplicity of an all-in-one form factor.
Current offerings such as Cardboard and Gear VR offer a mobile form factor, but they essentially reappropriate a smartphone in order to drive a VR experience. While the work companies have done to create VR on a device we already have in our pockets is tremendous, several compromises have to be made. Smartphone architecture has been designed around sipping on battery life, spinning up CPU resources only when necessary, then quickly returning to a low power state. VR, on the other hand, needs resources running at a sustained high level for as long as possible.
Asking a smartphone processor to run VR experiences is similar to asking a sprinter to compete in a marathon, they can probably do it, but there are better candidates available.
3. More convincing 3D
The current generation of VR headsets relies on a technique known as stereoscopy to deliver the sensation of three dimensions. In short, this technique involves displaying a slightly different perspective of a scene to each eye, from which the visual system then extracts depth. This is the same way that the human visual system recognizes depth in the real world, it’s the reason our eyes are spaced apart to provide two ever-so-slightly different perspectives of the same scene.
Stereoscopy produces a very convincing illusion of three dimensions from a two dimensional display. That said, stereoscopy isn’t the only way that the human brain perceives depth. In fact, if you’ve ever “lost” the feeling of depth halfway through a 3D movie, it’s likely because your brain isn’t receiving all the depth cues it needs to truly believe it’s not looking at a flat cinema screen. The human visual system relies on at least 18 different cues to perceive depth.
Some of these cues are obvious. Occlusion and parallax have been used to convey a sense of depth for a long time, but there are other cues that are much more difficult to reproduce. Take for example, the convergence cue, where the kinesthetic sensations of eye muscles focusing at various distances is combined to understand depth. This is a hugely challenging task to replicate in VR. How can we adjust a fixed screen to accommodate the user focusing near or far away within the virtual scene?
Thankfully, the answer appears to lay in eye-tracking technology. Various companies, such as Eyefluence, EyeTribe, and SMI, seem to be working on systems that can detect depth of focus. With this information, a VR system can then rerender a scene according to how far the user is looking into it. What results is the kinesthetic movement of the eye muscles matching the virtual movement of the display. If that’s hard to visualize, hold a finger four inches from your nose, then practice bringing your finger into focus, followed by your computer screen. It’s currently not possible to do this in VR – the eyes are focused on the fixed plane of the display situated a couple of inches from the eyes.
4. No-compromise gesture detection
While many VR experiences will be fantastic with the facilitation of a controller, “lightgun,” or gaming wheel, a large number of experiences will still benefit from hand input. Natural human gestures, such as waving, pointing, and grabbing, make a great deal of intuitive sense in VR. The current generation of devices do not natively support gesture detection, despite a number of players existing on the market. The reason: A number of challenges exist for gesture.
Firstly, the human brain is extremely sensitive to the articulation of our hands versus how they appear in our visual field. The nervous system has a class of receptors known as proprioceptors that can detect the position and rotation of joints, and the hand is full of them. This is why we know the position and articulation of our hands even when our eyes are closed. The challenge in VR is that this finely tuned positional system must match up to what is being displayed in the virtual world. Any offset may cause the brain to reject the representation, or contribute to a sense of sea sickness.
Gesture systems then need to be both extremely accurate and extremely fast to trick the brain into thinking it’s looking at its own hands rather than virtual ones. Luckily, there are a number of companies today working on high-accuracy, low-latency gesture solutions, and by the time next-gen VR headsets hit the shelves, there’s a very high chance at least some of them will come with gesture control right out of the box.
5. The “social sofa”
Current VR devices work well for closing off the real world and replacing it with a virtual one, but we have to remember that the real world still exists around the user, including obstacles, pets, and siblings. This represents a challenge for VR to become more social and more interactive.
Companies like Sony are taking creative approaches to maintain the “social sofa” of multiplayer experiences with asymmetrical VR/traditional game design, but ultimately the VR user is still closed off from others.
Video pass-through modes, as demonstrated by HTC a few months ago, could be used not only when the user is approaching an obstruction in the room, but also when other people are trying to get your attention or play alongside you, whether or not they have also donned a headset. Outside participants can be accurately rendered into a scene as avatars, allowing new ways to mix reality with VR. Optitrack demonstrated a quick taste of this in a spectacular fashion during GDC this year.
Increasing the level of social gaming both on the sofa and across locations will be an important component for creating sustained experiences, adding a replayability factor not seen in canned, linear VR experiences that make up a large proportion of initial content.
The features above are not a wishlist. They are all technologies that are arguably ready to be implemented in next-generation devices. These features will improve incrementally on the already impressive experiences that have created so much buzz about VR.
While VR 1.0 is off to an impressive start with a new frontier of content to explore, it’s heartening to know that we’re only just getting started with this medium. VR is where the smartphone was in 2007; hitting a key milestone by getting viable hardware to market, but only a preview of how ubiquitous the technology will become.